Tagged: discipline
Train Up A Child – Child Dedication Sermon
You can find “Train Up A Child” – a sermon for Child Dedication Sunday by hovering your mouse HERE
Let the little children come / The Rich young ruler – Luke 18:15-30 – sermon on-line
You can find audio to “The Faith of a Child, the Pride of an Adult” a sermon on Luke 18:15-30 by hovering or clicking your mouse HERE
The Sheep’s Responsibility to Their Shepherds – Sermon Audio on-line
You can find “The Sheep’s Responsibility to Their Shepherds” online at www.ccleadville.org/media
Are You Ready – Part 2 – sermon audio on-line
“Are You Ready – Part 2″ – a sermon in the series “A Person-Driven Life” which is a study of the gospel of Luke is now on-line. You can find it at www.ccleadville.org/media
Repentance & Forgiveness – some common objections
My first post on this subject discussed what I see as the Biblical pattern for forgiveness – forgiveness is to be given after repentance is offered. I quickly covered how we can see this pattern in the Levitical law of the sacrifices, in the way God forgives us, and in the way Jesus instructs us to forgive others.
This is a very difficult concept for many to grasp, because our culture, over the last how-many-ever years has taught us WRONGLY that forgiveness means that we just “overlook the offense and get over it.” And the church has bought the lie – telling believers that this is the “Christian” way to respond to offenses. But my contention is that such an idea is not only wrong, but unBiblical and damaging to the church.
I’d like to spend this post responding to some common objections to what the Bible REALLY teaches about forgiveness…
OBJECTION: But Jesus taught us to pray, “forgive us our sins, as we forgive those who have sinned against us.” Doesn’t that tell us that our forgiveness before God is dependent on our forgiveness of others? If we do not forgive, as you suggest, aren’t we putting our souls in danger?
RESPONSE: You are right in saying that there is some way in which our willingness to forgive others demonstrates whether we truly understand and therefore are able to receive our own forgiveness from the Father. But look closely at the verses in question (Matthew 6:9-15). Nowhere do those verses DEFINE what forgiveness is… it’s assumed that we know what it means, and that’s my main point – OUR MODERN CULTURE DOESN’T KNOW WHAT FORGIVENESS MEANS! We have to abandon our ideas of what it is and go to the scriptures for that definition!
Nowhere does the Bible even infer that forgiveness means “overlooking the sins of others.” Even God, the One with more mercy than anyone else, does not forgive by overlooking sins! He can’t because of His just nature - justice must be done, and to overlook a wrong would be an injustice!
So what DOES it mean when we pray that God will forgive us, as we forgive others? It means that we are asking God to forgive us WHEN WE REPENT (1 John 1:9, Psalm 7:12, Mark 1:4, Luke 13:3, Acts 3:19, 2 Corinthians 7:10, 2 Peter 3:9 ) as we forgive others when THEY repent! (the parable found in Matthew 18:21-35 is especially helpful here… notice that the forgiven servant was forgiven his debt to his Master WHEN HE REPENTED, but would not do the same for his fellow servant who also repented – THAT hypocrisy was what angered the Master). What Jesus is speaking to in the Matthew 6:9-15 passage is the very human tendency to hold a grudge even when a person is repentant! To say, “No, I can NEVER forgive you… even though you say you are sorry!” THAT is the hypocrisy of denying others the same mercy God has given to you, and the exact kind of unforgiveness Jesus is addressing.
OBJECTION: Jesus died “while we were still sinners” (Romans 5:8), so we should forgive just as He did.
RESPONSE: Yes, absolutely! Jesus died for us while we were still in our sinful condition. But He did not FORGIVE US of those sins until we turned to Him in repentance. If we imply by Romans 5:8 that Jesus automatically forgives us without our response of repentance, then we are saying that when Jesus died for the sins of the whole world (1 John 2:2, 1 Timothy 4:10), He forgave the sins of the world at that moment also. That is much more akin to Universalism than it is Christianity. As Romans 5:8 clearly teaches, Jesus’ death “while we were still sinners” shows His love for us, by providing the only appropriate sacrifice FOR our sins – thereby opening the way to forgiveness which the Father is eager to give to the repentant soul.
OBJECTION: What if the person who has sinned against us never repents or is unable to repent (dead, or in a coma, etc.)? Then are we just stuck with it? How can we ever be free of it if we don’t “forgive” (overlook the offense)? RELATED OBJECTION: Aren’t you acting as Judge in the situation if you refuse to “forgive” (overlook the offense)?
RESPONSE: This objection misunderstands what we ARE to do with offenses against us when a person is unrepentant.
There is no way in which we are “stuck with” the offense and the pain of it, etc. when we follow the example of Jesus in the way HE handed the sinful behavior leveled at Him. 1 Peter 1:21-24 teaches us that Jesus is our perfect example of what to do when we are treated wrongly. There are 3 simple (not always easy, but simple) steps that Peter outlines:
- Do not respond in kind (i.e. insult for insult or injury for injury)
- Entrust yourself (and the offense) to God, who judges justly.
- Trust in the healing Jesus has provided through His own suffering and death on your behalf.
What is actually happening when we apply Peter’s instruction? First, we are not allowing a fleshly or self-absorbed retaliation to the injury or sin. In other words, we are being careful to be angry (at the sin, as God is because wrong has been done… in fact, God will pour out His WRATH on sin eventually – Revelation 19:15), without sinning (Ephesians 4:26). For the sake of clarity, let me say it again without the parentheses - The first thing we are doing by not retaliating is to be careful that our righteous anger over the offense does not manifest itself in our own equally sinful response.
The second thing we are doing is giving ourselves and our welfare in the offensive situation to God, the One Who will judge justly. This, like our initial faith in Christ, is an act of trust. We are trusting that God will take this, He will handle it rightly, and we no longer have reason or need to hold on to or harbor the offense. It is in God’s heavenly courtroom now, where He serves as Judge – and we have nothing more to do with it.
OBJECTION: When we refuse to “forgive” (overlook the offense) aren’t we allowing the sinner to control us and therefore losing our freedom in Christ?
RESPONSE: If we are following the pattern Peter lays out for us (1 Peter 1:21-24) as described in the previous response – then we are trusting God to be in control – of the situation and of us as His children. We are actually moving INTO the freedom Christ provides for us by releasing the offense to the righteous judgement of God and walking in personal victory over the feelings of hurt and offense. Only Christ can provide that, and He does it only through the cross.
FINAL THOUGHTS: A wrong view of forgiveness that flows out of our own disobedience?
I know this way of thinking about forgiveness is stripping the gears of many of you. But that’s what happens when we approach issues Biblically instead of how we’ve been taught to view them culturally. Our conditioned way of thinking that is unBiblical is challenged and tweaked by what the scriptures really say. Since the gears are already stripped, I might as well throw in one more related issue…
Our “waiting” for repentance from an offending person should not be done in a non-chalant, unconcerned way. In fact, we should be pursuing their repentance. Most have not noticed that the parable of the unforgiving/unmerciful servant (Matthew 18:21-35), which defines forgiveness, comes IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING Jesus’ instruction that we are to go to each other to work out conflict and offenses (read the whole passage here).
Could it be that we’ve defaulted to a definition of forgiveness that means “overlook the offense” because we are so fearful of conflict that we are being willingly disobedient to Jesus’ commands to go to those who offend us? After all, it’s easier, causes less turmoil, and looks so “nice” and “Christian” (as we’ve come to define it). But it’s not Biblical. Not in the least.
There’s no arguing, going to someone who has offended you IS a mess much of the time – Christian or not. So why would Jesus instruct is to do something that has the potential of blowing up in our faces? Why? – Out of love for each of us individually and out of love for us corporately as His church! When we refuse to approach an offense, we are in large part closing the door to the possibility of the offending person’s repentance – which is the very best thing for them! Through the loving confrontation they have the chance to become aware of a sin in their life, and as a result have the opportunity to confess it and be forgiven and cleansed from it (1 John 1:9). And the person being obedient to carry out the loving confrontation, may just find that THEY were not seeing everything completely clearly and then have the opportunity to confess THEIR OWN sins in the situation. That is SUCH a loving thing, and a great benefit and sign of health for the church overall! And should the person initially confronted refuse to repent, then the opportunity is open to follow Jesus’ instruction about church discipline, which opens new doors to the restoration of the sinner and the overall purity of the church!
Like it or not – our view of forgiveness carries HUGE ramifications for the health of the church, Christ’s body and bride. A wrong view will short-circuit Jesus’ intention for our purity and holiness. A right view will only strengthen it.
Religion that can KILL you – sermon audio on-line
Our study through the book of Luke continues with, “Religion That Can KILL You” from Luke 11:37-12:3. Download a copy at www.ccleadville.org/media
Christian Parenting Mistake #7 – “He’s just tired…”
Let me paint the scenario for you (it happened just today, so it’s pretty easy)…
My daughter is leaving Kindergarten with my wife and calling “good-bye” to her friends. She says “Good-bye” and hugs one little girl, who is stiff as a board and says nothing. Another of them who was walking away hand in hand with her mother, is called BY NAME – “Bye so-and-so!” The little girl didn’t even turn around. Her mother turned her around and said, “Say good-bye, so-and-so…” The little girl scowled with her head down and refused to say anything. The Mom then said to my wife, (here it comes)… “She’s just tired…”
Let me ask you a question… since when is it acceptable for ANYONE to intentionally ignore another person who is talking directly to them? When adults do that we call it “RUDE.” It’s frowned upon, and is clearly not loving or considerate to the person attempting to interact with them.
Yet, Christian parents (people who are supposed to be following Jesus’ teachings and teaching their children to do the same) repeatedly (and I mean REPEATEDLY) excuse the selfish, rude, and UNACCEPTABLE behavior of their own children with the “He’s just tired…” excuse.
Are our kids sometimes tired and therefore more prone to being cranky and selfish? Absolutely! It goes for adults too – (and probably describes me at least once a week)! But since when is that a legitimate reason for bad, rude, inconsiderate behavior? If I were to ignore you when you were talking directly to me, and then say, “I’m just tired…”, You wouldn’t buy it for a second! Why do we allow it with our kids?!!???
Maybe it’s because we think, “They are just kids… they’ll learn in time…” But the truth is (and experience bears this out), they WON’T learn it if YOU, the PARENT, don’t TEACH THEM why it’s wrong and what to do instead! Many of the selfish, prideful, inconsiderate ADULTS of today are the result of such tragic parenting mistakes! The only thing they learned is that when their emotions get the best of them, then they are excused from decent behavior.
As Christian parents we must understand that there is a two-fold responsibility on us as parents in areas like this.
- We need to teach our children that THEY ARE RESPONSIBLE BEFORE GOD (and us as their parents and God’s primary representative authority in their lives) to be filled and controlled by the Spirit of God – NO MATTER THE SITUATION (tired, frustrated, angry, fearful, etc.)
- That requires that WE as parents REQUIRE appropriate behavior of them, even in public (as was the case at my daughter’s school today). The fruit of the Spirit listed in Galatians chapter 5 need to be flowing out of our children as young representatives of Christ! It takes some appropriate discipline to bring this about (which many parents are afraid of – another of the many Christian parenting mistakes), but it can and SHOULD be done.
You may think, “My kid is just shy…” The truth is that my daughter is naturally shy too – but my wife has been teaching her to be friendly to her friends – to be like Jesus EVEN THOUGH she is shy. Shyness, like the other things mentioned, is not an excuse to be rude or inconsiderate.
My desire is not for parents to be “Drill Sgts.” to their kids, but to teach them the self-control and discipline needed to be loving, considerate CHRISTIANS in a world that knows very little about such things.
“She’s just tired…” No, she’s just badly parented.
Dogs, Children, and Foolish Parents
This makes be SOOO angry!
My wife was having coffee with a friend today. The friend glanced out the window of the coffee shop and saw furniture being moved out of her Chiropractor’s office. She said, “Oh, I hope he’s not quitting business. He might have been forced to…”
She went on to tell this tragic / foolish / terrible story…
The Chiropractor was in the habit of having his dog at his office. It was a gentle dog, had never caused any trouble, but had been adopted by the Chiropractor out of an abusive situation. A customer had come into the Chiropractor’s office with her little girl. The Chiropractor saw the little girl playing with the dog in a manner that wasn’t very safe. She was getting it it’s face, holding it’s ears, etc. He told her not to do that sort of thing because the dog didn’t like it. She continued to do it anyway. The Chiropractor warned her again – repeatedly. She still persisted in her behavior. All the while the mom, within earshot of everything, did nothing.
I don’t have to tell you the end of the story. The dog eventually DID bite the little girl – right across her face. My wife’s friend was alluding to a hope that the Chiropractor didn’t have to quit business because he was sued.
For the sake of clarity I have to say – dogs will be dogs. They are animals. They will bite when they feel intimidated, harrassed, or in danger. No question. But was the dog the one to blame in this situation? I don’t think so… I think it was a very foolish mom who was to blame. Let me explain…
I can only find a handful of options for why we continue to read about this sort of thing in the papers…
-
The mom didn’t have the ability to control her daughter (an issue of bad parenting)
-
The mom didn’t care to control her daughter (an issue of neglectful parenting)
-
The mom had not taught her daughter a proper respect for animals and adults (another issue of bad parenting)
-
Or a combination of these…
But like most of our lawsuit-happy culture, the Chiropractor was to blame, not the mom or the girl.
I’ve seen this sort of thing happen again and again. People (or their children) do stupid things to or around animals and when the animal responds as animals are bound to do, they owner of the animal is slapped with a lawsuit. Then I being to wonder, “Who’s more foolish? Those who bring such tragedies on themselves and then sue, or the courts that find their lawsuit to be valid and rule in their favor?” It’s certifiably insane how our society has devolved into an “Anyone-to-blame-but-me” mentality.
The moral of the story: Parents – BE PARENTS! It is your responsibility before God to control your children, teach them proper boundaries (for their own safety, if nothing else), and teach them respect for other people and their property (including their pets). It may take a firm hand if you’ve lost ground with your child in this area. It may take the dreaded “S” word (spanking – gasp!). But the bottom line (no pun intended) is that your child NEEDS you to enforce healthy boundaries for them. If you don’t, life eventually will.
Weigh out the difference: Would you rather spank your child if needed and save them from consequences much more horrible than a spanking, or will it take a tragic circumstance, where YOUR child is the one injured, to make you wake up?!!???
Don’t worry so much about damaging your child’s fragile ego… be more concerned about damaging your child’s LIFE by allowing such foolish behavior to put them in harm’s way! It’s the epitome of foolishness to expect that your child can behave any way they want to, simply because they are a child, and others should be liable for the results. That’s unwise (foolish) parenting – at best.
Spanking = Future Sexual Problems?
You may have seen the headline today: “STUDY: Spanking May lead to Sexual Problems Later.”
Though there is some attempt at moderation in the headline by the use of the word “may,” the general direction of the headline and the article is that spanking is clearly questionable behavior on the part of parents because of an adverse impact it is likely to have on their children in the future. This is one of the many examples of intellectual trickery (at best) and flat-out dishonesty at worst, that is present in the public dialogue of modern-day America. When you read the headlines and the articles that go with them – THINK! THINK! THINK! Don’t let yourself be fooled into believing that the “science” of a study like this is ironclad “proof” for anything. It’s far from it! Let’s examine it a bit further…
First, you have to notice some of the key words in the article: “May… could… suggests…” These words are leaving room for their initial conclusions to be wrong, which is highly appropriate and fair. If you read the article wisely, you’ll notice that the assertions of the headline are not at all “fact.” So don’t think that just because it’s in print, it’s a foregone conclusion. The conclusions of this study, like many, are very speculative at best…
Next, notice the actual criteria by which they included spanking in the study…
(the study) suggests that children whose parents spanked, slapped, hit or threw objects at them may have a greater chance of physically or verbally coercing a sexual partner, engaging in risky sexual behavior or engaging in masochistic sex, including sexual arousal by spanking.
So in this study they lumped parents who lovingly and carefully spanked their children in with those who “slap, hit, or threw objects at them.” There is a WORLD of difference between a controlled, loving, clearly-explained spanking and an impetuous slap, hit, or throwing of an object at a child. The first is careful, loving discipline, the second is violence. To lump them all together as the “same thing” is not only unfair, it is biased toward a certain outcome. That’s NOT good science. In any study or evaluation on a scientific level, as much effort as possible is to be given to making all things equal. In this case, the trouble was not taken to do so.
I can assure you, the outcome of the study would be FAR different if they made an individual category for children whose parents lovingly, carefully, and in a clearly controlled way, spanked their children. It takes a bit more work to do this, because you have to interview those who were spanked to find out what “kind” of spanking it was. Was it purely a fit of rage on the part of the parent? Was it unclear or ambiguous to the child as to why or how a spanking would come? Or was it a controlled, carefully-explained discipline done in love that the child clearly understood? The first two deserve to be lumped in with those who hit, slap, or throw things at their child. The last is light-years away from them.
Admittedly, headlines are designed to draw a reader in… to be enticing and provocative. That’s not going to change. What that means for the discerning parent and Christian is that they have to do the work of CAREFULLY READING, AND THINKING through the content of the article instead of taking the assertions of such a headline wholesale, as “truth.”
Living a wise life is hard work… and if parents (people in general) don’t get used to that fact and take it seriously, we’ll continue to slide into a very unwise mode of thinking, and have little impact on the world we live in for the good.
Disastrous parenting – toddler edition
SCENE 1: Mom and toddler are visiting your home. Said toddler is everywhere, all at once it seems. Any item within reach, from knick-knacks to books to the contents of the kitchen cabinets (which said toddler knows how to open) are grabbed, banged, placed in her drooling mouth (she’s teething), or thrown across the room.
Mom’s reaction? She says, “Janie, that’s a no-no.” - and DOES nothing about it.
SCENE 2: A group of moms and toddlers have gathered for a “playdate.” It’s been ”O.K.” given the daunting task of conversing on an adult level while trying to keep 6 toddlers occupied, safe, and relatively free of toddler-sized-conflict. As the first family attempts to leave, the toddler in question screws up his face, falls with a loud “thump” onto his diaper-cushioned bum, and screams pitifully at the top of his lungs while tears flow like a river. You can make out these toddlerish words through his wails, “No WANNA go! Nooooo!!!!!” Mom bends over to her precious boy and says (in a voice remniscent of a fairy god-mother or female Santa), “It’s time to go Brandon…. say good-bye to your friends… didn’t we have fun?…. Look! Katie is being good and getting on her coat! Maybe when we get home we can have a treat!” Then, looking to another mother who is nearby she says, “Oh… he’s SO exhausted! I think somebody needs a nap!”
These are two of many scenarios that play out daily in the world of parenting. Not uncommon. Not exaggerated at all. And they are examples of how I think today’s parents are not only doing a disservice to those around them, but ALSO handicapping their children for the future. I’ll explain.
A parent’s job in the actual task of parenting is to “TRAIN” their children (Proverbs 22:6). Training is undertaken to bring about some specified, tangible result (think of an Olympic athelete’s training). In this case, the desired outcome is a respectful, Godly individual who has learned to revere and respect God first, authority second, and others third (notice that THEIR self-interest is not even on that list). Practically, that means that their outward behavior shows that at the heart level they are repsectful, Godly, etc. (Proverbs 20:11) A parent who wants to TRAIN their child toward this end is aware of the need of being in control of EVERY situation, no matter how inconvenient or embarrassing (we’re talking about toddlers here… the method will vary as a child gets older) so that they can TRAIN the child toward the desired end.
For some, this will take a complete overhaul or change of mindset. You don’t think of yourself as authoritative in the life of your child (for many reasons, probably). You want to be their “friend” not their parent. You want to let them ”be themselves” and explore the world (not a bad thing, but most people, when being themselves are selfish and inconsiderate. Is THAT the person you want your child to be?) No matter what thinking you have on the subject, the reality is this: YOU are the PARENT. YOU know best what is in the interest for your child’s well-being both now (in the immediate, emotional moment) and in the future (the person you and God desire them to become). In situations like the ones noted above, NO training was taking place – only accommodation, coddling, toleration of wrong behavior, and excuse making. This DOES NOT benefit your child. It only teaches them that THEY call the shots, not you (or God) – which is handicapping them for dealing with the realities of life. The eventual result, in the best case, is that the child will grow up with a sense of entitlement and “I matter most” in their minds.
Many parents are pulling their hair out concerning how to handle their toddlers because they haven’t properly gone about training them how to behave properly. But it’s not too late! Toddlers, though very immature and full of energy, STILL need to be taught how to behave politely, properly, considerately toward others (a huge task, I know), and in a way that honors God! It not only needs to be taught, but required of them! Don’t underestimate them! Don’t write things off because of their immaturity! Don’t make excuses for wrong behavior (“He’s SO tired”)! You CAN teach and train your child to be different, now, in all of these areas – and they CAN get it!
And by the way, this is a LOVING act – not a harsh one! It’s for their good and in the best interest of your family and an act of love toward the world you and your child live in! It’s an act of kindness, a blessing you are providing them, a tool you are equipping them with. You are giving them the priceless gifts of wisdom and self-control – two qualities sorely lacking in our “my-feelings-matter-most” world. As a parent you HAVE to take a long view on this. Try to look ahead to foresee what your toddler’s current behavior patterns will take him to as an adult. Look at all the adults you know (maybe in your own home) who can’t do what’s right because their feelings of selfishness, entitlement, and personal inconvenience dominate them. Is THAT the kind of adult you want your child to become?
I don’t write about this from a Pollyanna-ish perspective. I have 5 kids – my youngest just exiting the toddler years. I can tell you from experience that my kids were not exceptionally well-behaved or compliant from the womb. I had strong-willed ones, stubborn ones, high-energy ones, ones that were smarter than me, manipulative ones, emotional ones – but by God’s grace they were all trained by the time they were 3 or 4 years old to be respectful of people and property, genuinely loving and thoughtful toward others, kind and sharing, and a true joy to be around. They are not perfect, I am not perfect, and the process is not finished. In fact, there are very clear areas we are dealing with, in each of their lives, even as I write. But the point is this: it CAN be done with God’s help. God has provided the wisdom, His Spirit, and the will for us to be GREAT parents who raise GODLY children.
I’ll cover much more practical stuff in future posts, but for now I’ll walk through the scenes above and tell you what should have been done.
SCENE 1: The parents (mom and dad) should begin at home, teaching Janie what is acceptable for her to handle and have at her age. Certain things/areas should be off limits (electrical outlets, kitchen cabinets, jumping on furniture, for example) and enforced (swats, spankings, slap on the hand, etc.). With loving consistency, Janie will learn quickly what is acceptable and what is not. She should also be taught not to throw anything indoors – again, the consistent and immediate physical consequences will make the difference in whether or not this training “takes.” In all of this the parents need to highlight that respectful and considerate behavior (define those words for your kids, on their level) makes Jesus happy.
Fast forward to the visit to a friend’s house. Mom should discuss Janie’s behavior BEFORE they get there. Remind her not to throw stuff, stay out of cabinets, etc. Our children do remarkably well when we let them know what to expect, and what is expected of them. Reiterate the importance of repsect for people and property. Emphasize respecting others. Upon arrival (until Janie is practiced at being respectful and considerate – in a general sense), mom should have some activity in hand (dolls, coloring book, etc.) that Janie can do while in the same room as mom. This way mom is available to tell her “No” and give her a swat if she forgets her boundaries. The main things that were wrong in scene 1 are that Janie didn’t know her boundaries and that mom said, “no” but never enforced it. Janie knows that mom doesn’t REALLY mean it…
SCENE 2: Again, traning before the fact does wonders. If Brandon had been told prior to arriving at the playdate that he would be expected to leave happily and obediently when mom called him, or else he’d receive a spanking at home, he would have been much more compliant (providing he really BELIEVES he’ll get the spanking when he gets home, which is an issue of prior consistency). Again, stress how important respect for others, consideration, self-control are to God (yes, use the word self-control and teach your kids what it means, and that God’s Spirit desires to produce it in them in order to make God happy).
Once you arrive at the playdate, should he resort to the manipulative behavior of falling to the ground, crying, screaming, etc. – then mom is on the hook to make her authority respected. A quick swat to the seat of the pants and a firm, “No, you do NOT cry and throw a fit when it’s time to go. You say, ‘O.K. Mommy’ and then you come,” is what is needed. Notice that not only was the wrong behavior defined, but a right behavior was given as well. Our kids need to know what TO do, not only what not to do. Some of the key things that were damaging in Scene 2 were: toleration of wrong behavior, attempts at distraction, comparison with other children, attempts at coercion, lack of immediate discipline, excuse making.
More to come in the future… comments are welcome!